Scientific thesis presents the original research work of a scholar to the scientist or research community. A scientific thesis aims to add value to the existing knowledge via six sections structured chronologically; the introduction, literature review, methodology, findings & discussion, and conclusion sections. After putting in the figures and results, the next critical step is to pen down the discussion. There is no iota doubt that writing a scientific is daunting, and the most difficult, thought-provoking part is crafting the discussion section.
Discussion chapter, the last part of a scientific thesis, summarises the key findings in comparison with the previous researchers. The elements to be included in this section must be very precise and make sense to the reader without any interpretation.
Describe the conclusion from your results, and explain what it means with respect to the existing findings. Emphasize how the results support or refute the present hypothesis in the field (if any). If there is any data conflict with the existing ones, address them in this section.
Underline how your findings contribute to your field of study and help the domain progress. Provide a due to your results and do not undermine them. If you haven’t described the findings in the right manner, take help from PhD thesis editors in India and refine it.
In addition to the importance of your study, you should also explain its limitations. Briefly explain the limitations of your hypothesis or experimental approach and the reasoning behind it. This will help future research in generating hypotheses and approaches without facing the same challenges.
Depending on the journal you are publishing in, provide a separate future direction, rather than tying into a discussion. In addition consider posing a few questions, in the form of a hypothesis and set a foundation for future research.
Although it is necessary to include results with their due and underscore their significance, extrapolating your results, interpreting elements beyond the scope of the study must be avoided. Also do not introduce any new results in the discussion. This will confuse your reader and will deviate them from the major findings of your study. To add to this, avoid using too many scientific jargon. If you have included plenty of them, take assistance from PhD thesis editors in India and get it eliminated. An effective discussion stands on its own and is the most substantial section in your thesis. Hence sure that it accomplishes its primary goal, the accentuation of your findings in an apt manner.